Input value
Skip to Main Content

CBS PhD School logo

Institutional Organizational Analysis - Change and Transformation - 5+1 ECTS

Date and time

Monday 22 September 2025 at 13:00 to Friday 26 September 2025 at 14:00

Registration Deadline

Monday 11 August 2025 at 23:55

Location

Kilen - room KL4.74 (fourth floor), Kilevej 14A, 2000 Frederiksberg Kilen - room KL4.74 (fourth floor)
Kilevej 14A
2000 Frederiksberg

Institutional Organizational Analysis - Change and Transformation - 5+1 ECTS

Course coordinators: Eva Boxenbaum, Department of Organization (IOA)

 
Faculty 
 
Professor Tammar Zilber
Department of Organization, CBS & Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Professor Renate Meyer
Department of Organization, CBS & WU Vienna

Professor Eva Boxenbaum
Department of Organization, CBS

Susanne Boch Waldorff
Department of Organization, CBS

Prerequisites 
 
The PhD student must be working on a research project that lends itself to an organizational institutional analysis. Naturally, the idea is not to push students into becoming institutional theorists, but to make them reflect upon their projects from this theoretical perspective. 
 
Phd students are required required to present a five-pages (maximum) written presentation in which they relate the curriculum literature in the course to their project. The presentation must include specific references to the literature applied. Deadline for submission of course paper is 23 August 2025. This written presentation will be shared with other students and students will present their project in the course and will receive feedback on it.  
 
The student presentation should provide material for discussion in minor groups during the course, and the student must be willing to participate in discussions of other presentations. 
 
It is a precondition for receiving the course diploma that the student attends the entire course. 
 
Aim 

The goal of the course is to give participants a broad overview of organizational institutionalism including its development over time and its application to different empirical phenomena. Students will also develop their capacity to use the approach in their own empirical work. 
 
Course Content 
 
The course focuses on the school within institutional theory that is rooted in sociology. We trace the development of the theory from its conception to its most recent developments and applications in organizational analysis. We explore historical change and transformations in the meaning of organizational structures and practices and analyze how institutions are constructed and diffused; how institutional elements are incorporated into and translated in organizations as well as how institutional change and institutional entrepreneurship influence specific organizational fields.
 
We discuss diverse methodological approaches to the study of institutionalization processes – macro- as well as micro approaches – and explore the applicability of institutional theory and methods to the empirical projects of course participants. 
 
Teaching style 

Lectures with workshops, dialogues and student discussions. 
 
Lecture plan 

Sept. 22 (13-17) 
Foundations of new institutional theory 
Empirical findings on diffusion and decoupling 
 
Sept. 23 (9-17, possibly dinner) 
Institutional fields and transformations  
Institutional change and multiple institutional logics 
Project discussions 
  
Sept. 24 (9-17) 
Translation of ideas  
Institutional work and entrepreneurship 
Project discussions 
 
Sept. 25 (9-17) 
Methods in institutional analyses 
Critiquing organizational institutional analysis 
Project discussions 
 
Sept. 26 (9-14) 
New directions in organizational institutional analysis
Using institutional theory in organizational practice 
Wrap-up and evaluations  
 
Optional add-on: Oct. 7 (13-16) 
Project discussions (online) 
 
Learning objectives 

Participants get insights into the historical development of organizational institutionalism and into the most recent approaches to organizational stability, change and transformation. The participants also learn how to use the theory in empirical work, especially in their own projects.  
 
Exam 

N/A 
 

Course Literature (preliminary)

Alvesson & Spicer (2019). ‘Neo-institutional theory and organization studies: A mid-life crisis?’ Organization Studies, 40(2), 199-218.

Battilana, Leca & Boxenbaum (2009). ‘How actors change institutions: Toward a theory of institutional entrepreneurship’. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65-107.

Berg Johansen & Waldorff (2017). ‘What are institutional logics - and where is the perspective taking us?’ In Kruecken, Mazza, Meyer, & Walgenbach (Eds.): New Themes in Institutional Analysis: 51-76.

Boxenbaum & Jonsson (2017). ‘Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: concept evolution and theoretical challenges’. In Greenwood, Oliver, Lawrence, & Meyer (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed.: 79-104. 

Brandtner, Powell, & Horvath (2023). ‘From iron cage to glass house: Repurposing of bureaucratic management and the turn to openness’. Organization Studies,10.1177/01708406231200727. 

Czarniawska & Joerges (1996). ‘Travel of ideas’. In Czarniawska & Sevon (Eds.), Translating Organizational Change: 13-47. 

DiMaggio & Powell (1983). ‘The Iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’ (chapter 3 in Powell & DiMaggio, 1991)

Drori (2019). ‘Hasn’t institutional theory always been critical?!’ Organization Theory, 1(1), doi 2631787719887982. 

Drori (2025 forthcoming). ‘Institutional stress: Academic freedom under attack by democratic backsliding.’ Organization Studies

Friedland & Alford (1991). ‘Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions’ (chapter 10 in Powell & DiMaggio, 1991).

Galleli & Amaral (2025). ‘Bridging institutional theory and social and environmental efforts in management: A review and research agenda.’ Journal of Management, 01492063251322429. 

Grafström, Jonsson & Klintman (2023). ‘Embracing the academic–practice gap: Knowledge collaboration and the role of institutional knotting’. Management Learning, pp.1-24. 

Gümüsay & Amis (2020). ‘Engaging with grand challenges: An institutional logics perspective.’ Organization Theory, 1(3).

Jancsary, Meyer, Höllerer, & Boxenbaum (2018). ‘Institutions as multimodal accomplishments: Towards the analysis of visual registers’. In: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Multimodality, Meaning, and Institutions) 54A, 87-117. 

Jancsary, Meyer, Höllerer & Barberio (2017). ‘Toward a structural model of organizational-level institutional pluralism and logic interconnectedness’. Organization Science, 28(6), 1150-1167. 

Lawrence, Leca & Zilber (2013). ’Institutional work: Current research, new directions and overlooked issues’. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1023-1033. 

Lawrence & Suddaby (2006). ’Institutions and institutional work.’ In Clegg, Hardy, Nord, & Lawrence (Eds.), SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd ed.: 215-254. 

Lechterman & Mair (2024). ‘Social enterprises as agents of social justice: A Rawlsian perspective on institutional capacity’. Organization Studies, 45(9), 1301-1323. 

Leibel, Hallett & Bechky (2018). ‘Meaning at the source: The dynamics of field formation in institutional research’. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 154-177. 

Leixnering, Meyer & Doralt (2022). ’The past as prologue: Purpose dynamics in the history of the aktiengesellschaft’. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 78, 97-120. 

Meyer, J. & Rowan (1977). ‘Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony’ (chapter 2 in Powell & DiMaggio, 1991) 

Meyer, R. (2008). ‘New sociology of knowledge: Historical legacy and current strands’ In Greenwood, Oliver, Suddaby, & Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism: 519-538. 

Meyer, Jancsary, & Höllerer (2021). “Zones of Meaning, Leitideen, Institutional Logics” in Research in the Sociology of Knowledge, 70, 161-186

Munir (2019). ‘Challenging institutional theory’s critical credentials’. Organization Theory, 1(1), doi 2631787719887975. 

Powell (1991). ‘Expanding the scope of institutional analyses’ (chapter 8 in Powell & DiMaggio, 1991).

Røvik (2016). ‘Knowledge transfer as translation: Review and elements of an instrumental theory’. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18, 290-310. 

Strang & Meyer, J. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), 487–511.

Wedlin & Sahlin (2017). ’The imitation and translation of management ideas’. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (2nd ed.): 102-127. 

Wooten & Hoffman (2017).’Organizational fields: Past, present and future’ In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed.: 55-74. 

Wæraas & Nielsen (2016). ‘Translation theory “translated”: Three perspectives on translation in organizational research.’ International Journal of Management Reviews, 18, 236–270.

Zilber (2020). ‘The methodology/theory interface: Ethnography and the microfoundations of institutions’. Organization Theory, 1(2), 1-27. 

Zilber (2024). ’Narrating institutional logics into effect: Coherence across cognitive, political, and emotional elements.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 69, 172-221.

Course Diploma

PhD students must participate in the entire course to be eligible for the course diploma. The diploma will be issued after the last day of the course or following any exam or assignment due after the course. It will be sent to the email address you provided during registration.

Registration Deadline and Conditions

The binding registration deadline is 11 August 2025. If you wish to cancel your registration, you must do so by this date. After the deadline, we will assess whether there are sufficient registrations to run the course and, if necessary, allocate seats if demand exceeds capacity.

If seats remain available after this deadline, the registration period may be extended to fill the remaining seats.

Please note that once you receive our acceptance or welcome letter, your registration becomes binding, and no refunds of the course fee will be issued.

If the number of course registrations exceed the available seats, admission will be granted on a first-come, first-served basis, or—where applicable—based on the motivation submitted at registration. Priority will be given to CBS PhD students
 
Payment Methods
 
Ensure you choose the correct payment method when finalizing your registration:
 
CBS students:
Select the payment method CBS PhD students. The course fee will be deducted from your PhD course budget.
 
Students from Other Danish Universities: 
Select the payment method Danish Electronic Invoice (EAN). Provide your EAN number, attention, and any relevant purchase (project) order number.
If you do not pay via EAN number, select Invoice to pay via electronic bank payment (+71).
 
Students from Foreign Universities:
Select the payment method Payment Card. If you are unable to pay by credit card, choose Invoice International to pay via bank transfer.
 

Event Location

Click to view the event location on Google Maps >

Organizer Contact Information

CBS PhD School
Nina Iversen
Phone: +45 3815 2475
ni.research@cbs.dk

Organizer Contact Information

CBS PhD School
Nina Iversen
Phone: +45 3815 2475
ni.research@cbs.dk