Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2019). Neo-institutional theory and organization studies: a mid-life crisis? Organization Studies, 40(2), 199-218.
Battilana, Leca & Boxenbaum (2009). How actors change institutions: Toward a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65-107.
Berg Johansen & Waldorff (2017). What are institutional logics - and where is the perspective taking us? In G. Kruecken, C. Mazza, R. E. Meyer, & P. Walgenbach (Eds.): New Themes in Institutional Analysis: 51-76. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Boxenbaum & Jonsson (2017). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: concept evolution and theoretical challenges. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C.,
Lawrence, T.B., & Meyer, R. E. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (2nd ed.): 77-101. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Boxenbaum & Strandgaard (2009). Scandinavian institutionalism – a case of institutional work. In T. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations: 178-204. Cambridge University Press.
Bromley & Powell (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 483–530.
Cappelen & Strandgaard Pedersen (2021). Inventing culinary heritage through strategic historical ambiguity’. Organization Studies, 42(2), 223–243.
Cartel, Boxenbaum & Aggeri (2019). Just for fun! How experimental spaces stimulate innovation in institutionalized fields. Organization Studies, 40(1), 65-92.
Czarniawska & Joerges (1996). Travel of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (Eds.), Translating Organizational Change: 13-47. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
DiMaggio & Powell (1983). The Iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Chapter 3 in
W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Drori (2019). ‘Hasn’t institutional theory always been critical?!’ Organization Theory, 1(1), doi.org/10.1177/2631787719887982
Friedland & Alford (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. Chapter 10 in W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Greenwood, Oliver, Lawrence & Meyer (2017). Introduction: Into the fourth decade. In authors (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed.: 1-23. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Jancsary, Meyer, Höllerer & Barberio (2017). Toward a structural model of organizational-level institutional pluralism and logic interconnectedness. Organization Science, 28(6), 1150-1167.
Lampel & Meyer (2008). ’Field-configuring events as structuring mechanisms: How conferences, ceremonies, and trade shows constitute new technologies, industries, and markets’. Journal of Management Studies, 45(6): 1025-1035.
Lawrence & Suddaby (2006). ’Institutions and institutional work.’ In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, W. R. Nord, & T. B. Lawrence (Eds.), SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd ed.: 215-254. London, UK: Sage.
Lawrence, Leca & Zilber (2013). Institutional work: Current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1023-1033.
Mazza & Strandgaard Pedersen (2017). Organizational adaptation and inverse trajectories: Two cities and their film festivals. In G. Kruecken, C.
Mazza, R. E. Meyer, & P. Walgenbach (Eds.), New Themes in Institutional Analysis: 282-304. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Meyer & Rowan (1991 [1977]). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Chapter 2 in W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Meyer (2008). New sociology of knowledge: Historical legacy and current strands. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism: 519-538. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Meyer, R. (2019). ’A processual view on institutions. A note from a phenomenological institutional perspective’. In T. Reay, T. B. Zilber, A.
Langley & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), Institutions and Organizations: A Process View. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Munir (2019). ‘Challenging institutional theory’s critical credentials’. Organization Theory, 1(1), doi 2631787719887975.
Powell (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analyses. Chapter 8 in
W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Reay, Goodrick, Waldorff, & Casebeer (2017). ‘Getting leopards to change their spots: Co-creating a new professional role identity.’ Academy of Management Journal, 60 (3), 1043-1070.
Jakob Sadeh & Zilber (2019). ’Bringing “together”: Emotions and power in organizational responses to institutional complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5): 1413-1443.
Strandgaard & Dobbin (2006). In search of identity and legitimation: Bridging organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 897-907.
Reay, Goodrick, Waldorff, & Casebeer (2017). ‘Getting leopards to change their spots: Co-creating a new professional role identity.’ Academy of Management Journal, 60 (3), 1043-1070.
Waldorff & Madsen (2022). ’Translating to maintain existing practices: Micro-tactics in the implementation of a new management concept’. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221112475
Waldorff, Reay & Goodrick (2013). A tale of two countries: How different constellations of logics impact action. In M. Lounsbury, & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional Logics in Action. Research in the Sociology of
Organizations, 39A, 99-129. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Willmott, H. (2015). ‘Why institutional theory cannot be critical?’ Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(1):105-111.
Wooten & Hoffman (2017).’Organizational fields: Past, present and future’ In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed.: 55-74. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Zilber (2020). The methodology/theory interface: Ethnography and the microfoundations of institutions. Organization Theory, 1(2), 1-27.
Zilber (2014). Beyond a single organization: Challenges and opportunities in doing field level ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 3(1), 96-113.